<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interconnect IT - WordPress Consultants, Web Development and Web Design &#187; Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interconnectit.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interconnectit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Some Interesting Stats on WordPress and WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.interconnectit.com/69/some-interesting-stats-on-wordpress-and-wordpresscom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interconnectit.com/69/some-interesting-stats-on-wordpress-and-wordpresscom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Coveney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liverpoolwebdesigner.com/2008/01/21/some-interesting-stats-on-wordpress-and-wordpresscom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing a little thinking about WordPress and its rival CMS systems.  And then I thought&#8230; it&#8217;s not hard to find comparisons if you know where to look.  Sadly it&#8217;s hard to find hard numbers &#8211; people hold this data dearly.
Still &#8211; I had a play with Alexa and Google and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing a little thinking about WordPress and its rival CMS systems.  And then I thought&#8230; it&#8217;s not hard to find comparisons if you know where to look.  Sadly it&#8217;s hard to find hard numbers &#8211; people hold this data dearly.</p>
<p>Still &#8211; I had a play with Alexa and Google and the stats were interesting to see.  WordPress.com has practically exploded.  If Alexa&#8217;s 2% reach is correct then that makes WordPress.com and all its blogs into one of the most potent internet nodes.</p>
<p>Looking for traffic to WordPress.org and its rivals (I&#8217;ve put in Joomla, Plone and Drupal) is also illuminating.  I recommend a good play around with the charts.  Also look at different regions if you&#8217;re working with Google.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=wordpress%2C+joomla%2C+drupal%2C+wordpress.com%2C+plone&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=US&amp;geor=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0" title="Google's CMS Traffic">Google&#8217;s CMS traffic</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/wordpress.com?site0=wordpress.org&amp;site1=joomla.org&amp;site2=drupal.org&amp;site3=wordpress.com&amp;site4=plone.org&amp;y=r&amp;z=3&amp;h=300&amp;w=610&amp;range=5y&amp;size=Medium" title="Alexa's CMS traffic">Alexa&#8217;s CMS traffic</a></p>
<p>I find these stats sites great fun.  You can also see the effects of certain events.  For example, searches for the word Botfly shot up and into existance last year &#8211; and these correlated with spikes in traffic to my story of my own experience of the little blighters.  The reason was a TV show.</p>
<p>You can also get a taste for the desires of certain countries&#8230; French Kissing, it seems, generates huge interest in Pakistan.  They also like English Girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interconnectit.com/69/some-interesting-stats-on-wordpress-and-wordpresscom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Ranking Effect on Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.interconnectit.com/30/google-ranking-effect-on-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.interconnectit.com/30/google-ranking-effect-on-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Coveney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liverpoolwebdesigner.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/google-ranking-effect-on-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spend a lot of time persuading people of the importance of Google and other search engines on the popularity of a page to the world. For this page on a personal blog plenty of hits were coming in, yet suddenly there was an increase in traffic for this page which persisted.
Why?  Because for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We spend a lot of time persuading people of the importance of Google and other search engines on the popularity of a page to the world. For <a href="http://www.davesgonemental.com/giving-birth-to-a-baby-botfly/" title="Botfly account">this page on a personal blog</a> plenty of hits were coming in, yet suddenly there was an increase in traffic for this page which persisted.</p>
<p>Why?  Because for a year, the page came at the top of the <em>second</em> page of Google searches for the term &#8216;botfly&#8217; and then suddenly it got promoted to second from bottom of the first page. Look at the difference in clicks for that search term from Google:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://liverpoolwebdesigner.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/the_difference_a_ranking_makes1.jpg" alt="Google Ranking Effect Graph" /></p>
<p>The difference is worth about a 30% increase in traffic, in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interconnectit.com/30/google-ranking-effect-on-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
